Micrina material from four localities in three broadly synchronous late Atdabanian carbonate units was reconstructed as a sessile bivalved organism. Sellate sclerites preserve paired muscle scars, whereas mitral apophyses are interpreted as muscle platforms; valve homology and stem-brachiopod placement remain comparative hypotheses rather than preserved articulation.
Represented range521–514.5 Ma
Content packagemolluscs-brachiopods
PBDBtxn:7411
Evidence boundary
Automated checks cover structure, identifiers, translations and links only; maintainer and external expert review are not complete.
Claim ledger
topology · medium
Isolated Micrina sellate sclerites with paired muscle scars and mitral apophyses interpreted as muscle platforms support a reconstructed bivalved body and stem-brachiopod model; articulation, valve homology and direct ancestry are not preserved.
claim:taxon:micrinafossil-range · medium
Micrina material from four localities in three broadly synchronous late Atdabanian carbonate units supports a conservative Cambrian Stage 3 study-sample envelope of 521–514.5 Ma, not a global genus range, a brachiopod origin date or a direct-ancestor sequence.
claim:taxon:micrina:source-bounded-range-rc50taxonomy · medium
Micrina is retained as a tommotiid genus represented by isolated mitral and sellate sclerites; sellate paired muscle scars and mitral apophyses interpreted as muscle platforms inform a reconstructed bivalved arrangement, while valve homology and phylogenetic placement remain comparative hypotheses rather than preserved articulation.
claim:taxon:micrina:taxonomybiogeography · high
The represented Micrina material includes the Lower Cambrian Wilkawillina Limestone of the Arrowie Basin, South Australia, among four localities in three broadly synchronous carbonate units; these named collections do not establish a complete geographic distribution or an origin centre.
claim:taxon:micrina:biogeographyecology · medium
The reconstructed Micrina body is interpreted as sessile in an Early Cambrian marine carbonate setting, but diet, locomotion, guild and whole-body dimensions are not directly preserved by the isolated sclerites.
claim:taxon:micrina:ecologymorphology · medium
Micrina sellate phosphatic sclerites preserve paired muscle scars, whereas mitral sclerites bear apophyses interpreted as muscle platforms; their near-bilateral bivalved assembly is a reconstruction, not a fossil preserving both articulated valves.
claim:taxon:micrina:morphology
Known limits
A missing branch or fossil occurrence does not imply biological absence. Internal nodes are not calibrated divergence estimates.