EVO ATLASEN中文
图谱首页 / 故事 / 横跨食肉类起源、形态与功能的十一个证据档案
故事 / 18 分钟

横跨食肉类起源、形态与功能的十一个证据档案

沿具名牙齿、头骨、骨架、序列矩阵与数字实验前进,同时不把独立分支改写成祖先阶梯。

每一步标明所依据的主张,引用列于下方。交互探索状态可在完整应用中打开;故事本身仍是编辑综合。

故事步骤

01 · 55.9 Ma · 证据

数百件材料取代两颗牙的剪影

IRSNB M2095–M2099 记录可复原的恒齿列,距骨 IRSNB M2107–M2108 与跟骨 IRSNB M2109 则记录跗部。

已发表性状矩阵把多马尔犬兽恢复为基干食肉形类;这不证明它属于食肉目冠群、是直接祖先或全球最早食肉形类。

claim:event:dormaalocyon-dental-tarsal-sample
02 · 0 Ma · 树

传统“细齿兽类”并不组成两条整齐干群

矩阵为 40 个末端采样 99 个颅骨与牙齿性状;优选树把传统“细齿兽科”和古灵猫科排除在食肉目冠群之外。

该结果否定便捷的猫型—犬型祖先阶梯,但仍是采样形态拓扑,其节点可随评分、类群采样与分析假设改变。

claim:event:miacoidea-character-matrix-topology
03 · 44.1 Ma · 树

一件头骨检验犬型类基部

正模 UCMP 85202 提供头骨与齿列,关联副模 SDSNH 107446 和 SDSNH 107447 补充颅后解剖。

基干犬型类位置是分析结果,科级归属仍不确定;食性判别得分是比较模型输出,并非胃内容物或被观察到的狩猎。

claim:event:lycophocyon-holotype-basal-caniform
04 · 0 Ma · 树

现生序列分开两条冠群分支

串联矩阵为 76 个采样物种纳入 TR-i-I、TBG、IRBP、ND2、CYTB 与 12S rRNA 共 6,243 个碱基对。

这是 2005 年针对现生采样类群的序列拓扑;它既不观察化石解剖,也不固定化石首现、分化年代或 COL26.8 接受名。

claim:event:carnivora-six-gene-living-topology
05 · 39.3 Ma · 树

两个得州“细齿兽”物种被重新评分

古斯塔夫森兽正模头骨 TMM 40209-200 经 CT 复原;南方天使熊犬兽由 TMM 41850-1 与归入的颌骨材料代表。

新属与基干犬熊科位置来自修订评分和采样树;它们不定位犬熊类的精确地理起源,也不建立直接祖先关系。

claim:event:texas-basal-amphicyonid-reappraisal
06 · 0 Ma · 证据

数字下颌检验加载情景

正模 B-4071 是完整年轻成年头骨;2026 年分析比较犬齿、p4、m1 的内禀咬合和回拉、甩头外力,网格与脚本存放于 Zenodo。

应力场、相对咬力与行为情景依赖分割、材料属性、肌肉复原、约束和标准化;它们是模型实验,不是被观察到的进食。

claim:event:magericyon-feeding-fea
07 · 11.5 Ma · 证据

三件牙齿记录检验熊猫亲缘

正模 MNCN-CSIC NV-2-42 为左 P4;NV-2-40 为右 M1,IPS 46473 是保存 c1–m2 并关联 P4 的部分下颌。

大熊猫亚科位置与植食倾向来自性状矩阵和牙齿比较;两者都不证明与大熊猫生态相同,也不证明直接祖先或可靠起源中心。

claim:event:kretzoiarctos-dental-panda-topology
08 · 44.1 Ma · 地图

Three southern-California localities delimit the sample

UCMP and SDSNH material is reported from member C of the Santiago Formation in San Diego County; the map shows named study localities rather than a continental range.

The displayed interval is a source-bounded occurrence window, not a global first or last appearance.

claim:taxon:lycophocyon:biogeography · claim:taxon:lycophocyon:fossil-range
09 · 44.1 Ma · 树

Broad and Paleogene-only matrices answer differently

The 50-taxon analysis leaves nearby relationships unresolved, whereas the Paleogene-only consensus places Lycophocyon on the caniform branch outside crown Canoidea.

Both results are sampled morphology hypotheses; neither is an ancestor ladder.

claim:taxon:lycophocyon:taxonomy
10 · 44.1 Ma · 证据

A classifier compares 82 living reference species

A six-variable classifier assigned the holotype 83% posterior probability of carnivory, against 46 carnivores, 21 omnivores/hard-object feeders and 15 insectivores in the reference set.

This is a comparative dietary prediction, not a fossil stomach-content record.

claim:taxon:lycophocyon:ecology
11 · 11.5 Ma · 地图

Two Spanish basins anchor three dental records

Nombrevilla 2 supplies the P4 holotype and M1 paratype, while ACM/C6-Camí supplies the partial mandible and associated P4.

These occurrence points do not determine a panda-lineage origin centre or a global genus range.

claim:taxon:kretzoiarctos:biogeography · claim:taxon:kretzoiarctos:fossil-range
12 · 11.5 Ma · 树

A published ursid tree retains internal uncertainty

The fossil-plus-living matrix recovers Kretzoiarctos within Ailuropodinae, but its majority-rule bootstrap does not resolve internal ailuropodine clades.

The route compares a published morphology result; it is not a direct-ancestor claim or an ecological equivalence with living giant pandas.

claim:taxon:kretzoiarctos:taxonomy
13 · 11.5 Ma · 证据

A P4, M1 and mandible remain separate observations

Figure 1 documents the left P4 NV-2-42, right M1 NV-2-40 and IPS 46473 partial mandible; the route compares the preserved specimen record before any dietary interpretation.

Dental comparisons can inform a hypothesis, but do not observe feeding or establish giant-panda-equivalent ecology.

claim:taxon:kretzoiarctos:morphology · claim:taxon:kretzoiarctos:ecology
14 · 0 Ma · 证据

Standardized loads compare models, not fossil behaviour

Finite-element comparisons test canine, p4 and m1 bite positions plus standardized external loading; reported stress and force patterns are simulated under stated constraints.

The zero time range is the 2026 modelling event, not Magericyon's fossil occurrence; muscle reconstruction and loading choices condition the results.

claim:event:magericyon-feeding-fea
15 · 5.025 Ma · 树

一件西藏头骨进入联合树

正模 IVPP V18788.1 为成年部分头骨;IVPP V18788.2 是下颌支碎片,IVPP V18788.3 是部分前颌骨。原始磁性地层框架中的地点样本跨 5.95–4.10 Ma。

原始豹属归置、雪豹亲缘和亚洲生物地理情景都是后续工作可修订的分析结论;该样本不是全球豹亚科首现。

claim:event:panthera-blytheae-holotype-total-evidence
16 · 0 Ma · 证据

内耳预测狩猎,而非保存狩猎

36 件标本样本包含菲尔德博物馆的黄昏犬与恐犬头骨,分割左侧骨迷路并用 PCA、CVA 和 MANOVA 比较。

报告的 82.05% 分类率与扑击归类是受现生类别、尺度和系统关系制约的代理模型结果;它们不保存真实狩猎或社会行为。

claim:event:hesperocyon-bony-labyrinth-model
17 · 22 Ma · 证据

湖泊骨架混合陆生与水生性状

正模 NUFV 405 保存一具骨架约 65%,包括头骨、齿列、椎骨及大量前后肢,来自早中新世湖泊沉积。

半水生运动、鳍足形类位置和北极淡水转型分别是形态、拓扑与古环境解释;普伊拉兽没有被证明是鳍足类直接祖先。

claim:event:puijila-holotype-locomotor-mosaic
18 · 23 Ma · 证据

鳍足类干群骨架检验游泳力学

LACM 4321 保存头骨及大部分颅后骨架,使实测肢体比例与关节形态可同现生鳍足类和陆生食肉类比较。

COL26.8 通过食肉目路由 310 个现生接受种名。这是命名覆盖,不是十一个祖先阶段、310 个成熟档案、化石首现或拓扑与时钟模型的一致意见。

claim:event:enaliarctos-skeleton-swimming-model

参考文献

  1. Dental and tarsal anatomy of “Miacis” latouri and a phylogenetic analysis of the earliest carnivoraforms (Mammalia, Carnivoramorpha)Solé, F.; Smith, R.; Coillot, T.; De Bast, E.; Smith, T. · 2014 · DOI 10.1080/02724634.2013.793195
  2. Phylogeny of the Carnivora: basal relationships among the carnivoramorphans, and assessment of the position of “Miacoidea” relative to CarnivoraWesley-Hunt, G.D.; Flynn, J.J. · 2005 · DOI 10.1017/S1477201904001518
  3. A new basal caniform (Mammalia: Carnivora) from the middle Eocene of North America and remarks on the phylogeny of early carnivoransTomiya, S. · 2011 · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0024146
  4. Molecular phylogeny of the Carnivora (Mammalia): assessing the impact of increased sampling on resolving enigmatic relationshipsFlynn, J.J.; Finarelli, J.A.; Zehr, S.; Hsu, J.; Nedbal, M.A. · 2005 · DOI 10.1080/10635150590923326
  5. Whence the beardogs? Reappraisal of the Middle to Late Eocene “Miacis” from Texas, USA, and the origin of AmphicyonidaeTomiya, S.; Tseng, Z.J. · 2016 · DOI 10.1098/rsos.160518
  6. A new amphicyonine (Carnivora: Amphicyonidae) from the upper Miocene of Batallones-1, Madrid, SpainPeigné, S.; Salesa, M.J.; Antón, M.; Morales, J. · 2008 · DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2008.00788.x
  7. Insights into the feeding behavior of Magericyon anceps (Carnivora, Amphicyonidae) from the Late Miocene of Batallones-1 (Madrid, Spain) using finite element analysisDíaz de León-Muñoz, E.M.; Siliceo, G.; Ferreira, G.S. · 2026 · DOI 10.1007/s10914-026-09827-1
  8. Kretzoiarctos gen. nov., the oldest member of the giant panda cladeAbella, J.; Alba, D.M.; Robles, J.M.; et al. · 2012 · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048985
  9. Himalayan fossils of the oldest known pantherine establish ancient origin of big catsTseng, Z.J.; Wang, X.; Slater, G.J.; et al. · 2014 · DOI 10.1098/rspb.2013.2686
  10. Carnivoran hunting style and phylogeny reflected in bony labyrinth morphometrySchwab, J.A.; Kriwet, J.; Weber, G.W.; Pfaff, C. · 2019 · DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-37106-4
  11. A semi-aquatic Arctic mammalian carnivore from the Miocene epoch and origin of PinnipediaRybczynski, N.; Dawson, M.R.; Tedford, R.H. · 2009 · DOI 10.1038/nature07985
  12. Skeletal morphology and locomotor capabilities of the archaic pinniped Enaliarctos mealsiBerta, A.; Ray, C.E. · 1990 · DOI 10.1080/02724634.1990.10011803