EVO ATLASEN中文
Atlas home / References / A Divergence Dating Analysis of Turtles Using Fossil Calibrations: An Example of Best Practices
References / paper

A Divergence Dating Analysis of Turtles Using Fossil Calibrations: An Example of Best Practices

Joyce, W.G.; Parham, J.F.; Lyson, T.R.; Warnock, R.C.M.; Donoghue, P.C.J.

Year2013
Source roleprimary-study
DOI / ID10.1666/12-149

Fitness and scope

topology · range · geochronology · methods

Node 1 uses Caribemys oxfordiensis holotype MNHNCu P-3209 for a 155.6 Ma hard minimum and a 251.4 Ma soft maximum; posterior crown ages are model outputs, not specimen dates.

Claim ledger

divergence-time · medium

Caribemys holotype MNHNCu P-3209 supports a 155.6 Ma hard minimum for crown Testudines in the cited calibration scheme, whereas the older posterior crown interval is conditional on topology, molecular data, priors and clock model.

claim:event:caribemys-crown-turtle-calibration
fossil-range · low

The Pleurodira display route borrows the 155.6 Ma Caribemys-based hard minimum for crown Testudines as a conservative navigation boundary; that calibration is not a Pleurodira origin date, direct ancestor or audited global first appearance.

claim:taxon:pleurodira
fossil-range · low

The cited 155.6 Ma Caribemys minimum constrains crown Testudines rather than Pleurodira specifically, so the former Pleurodira range is withheld pending a node-specific fossil calibration.

claim:taxon:pleurodira:range-boundary
Open source ↗DOI ↗