EVO ATLASEN中文
Atlas home / References / Phylogenomic analyses support traditional relationships within Cnidaria
References / paper

Phylogenomic analyses support traditional relationships within Cnidaria

Zapata, F.; Goetz, F.E.; Smith, S.A.; Howison, M.; Siebert, S.; Church, S.H.; Sanders, S.M.; Ames, C.L.; McFadden, C.S.; France, S.C.; et al.

Year2015
Source roleprimary-study
DOI / ID10.1371/journal.pone.0139068

Fitness and scope

topology · methods

Uses 15 new transcriptomes plus 26 public genomes/transcriptomes; several deep nodes are supported while Hexacorallia is weak under the sampled matrices.

Claim ledger

topology · high

A 41-taxon phylogenomic matrix supports Anthozoa, Medusozoa, Octocorallia, Hydrozoa and a Staurozoa–Cubozoa–Scyphozoa clade, while Hexacorallia support is weak because Ceriantharia placement is equivocal.

claim:event:cnidarian-phylogenomic-sample
topology · high

Phylogenomic matrices sampling major cnidarian lineages recover Anthozoa as one of the two principal cnidarian branches; this sampled topology does not specify an anthozoan ancestor or fossil first appearance.

claim:taxon:anthozoa
fossil-range · low

Anthozoa has no supported scalar temporal range in the cited evidence: the phylogenomic analysis tests relationships among sampled living cnidarians but does not date a crown-Anthozoa fossil boundary, so the former 540–0 Ma display is withheld.

claim:taxon:anthozoa:range-boundary-rc50
Open source ↗DOI ↗