The atlas separates Darriwilian total-group plates from a much younger modelled crown origin, so fossil occurrence and molecular divergence are not conflated.
Represented range460–Present Ma
Content packageechinoderms
PBDBtxn:168786
Evidence boundary
Automated checks cover structure, identifiers, translations and links only; maintainer and external expert review are not complete.
Claim ledger
fossil-range · medium
The oldest fossil material assigned to Echinoidea consists of disarticulated bothriocidaroid plates from the Pygodus serra Zone of the Darriwilian; time-scaled analyses place the bothriocidaroid root in the Dapingian or Darriwilian.
claim:taxon:echinoidea:ordovician-stem-recorddivergence-time · medium
Phylogenomic dating places the origin of crown Echinoidea between the Pennsylvanian and Cisuralian across analyses, with most posterior probability in the early Permian; Ordovician echinoids are stem-group records.
claim:taxon:echinoidea:crown-origintaxonomy · medium
Ordovician bothriocidaroids are treated as stem echinoids, whereas crown Echinoidea is defined and dated separately in the phylogenomic analysis.
claim:taxon:echinoidea:taxonomybiogeography · medium
The highlighted Darriwilian plates are sampled occurrences and do not establish a global origin area or complete early distribution.
claim:taxon:echinoidea:biogeographyecology · medium
Living Echinoidea span shallow- and deep-water, epifaunal and infaunal, omnivorous and detritivorous modes; neither the global occurrence study nor disarticulated stem plates establishes one ancestral ecology or body-size envelope.
claim:taxon:echinoidea:ecologymorphology · medium
Bothriocidaroid plates document stem-echinoid test construction, while crown-character evolution is evaluated in a separate phylogenomic framework.
claim:taxon:echinoidea:morphologyfossil-range · medium
The 460–0 Ma range uses Darriwilian total-group material; it is not the crown origin, which is modelled much later across sampled analyses.
claim:taxon:echinoidea:fossil-range
Known limits
A missing branch or fossil occurrence does not imply biological absence. Internal nodes are not calibrated divergence estimates.